<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Surf Rats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://willkemp.net.au/blog/20080330-surf-rats/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://willkemp.net.au/blog/20080330-surf-rats</link>
	<description>a blog by Will Kemp</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 11:29:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juls</title>
		<link>http://willkemp.net.au/blog/20080330-surf-rats/comment-page-1#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Juls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 04:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snapandscribble.com/blog/will/?p=8#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Mud Rats haha! 
Sounds like it would be VERY loosely described as rock&#039;n&#039;roll... sounds more like country to me! I do love a bit of Hank too though...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mud Rats haha!<br />
Sounds like it would be VERY loosely described as rock&#8217;n'roll&#8230; sounds more like country to me! I do love a bit of Hank too though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: will</title>
		<link>http://willkemp.net.au/blog/20080330-surf-rats/comment-page-1#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snapandscribble.com/blog/will/?p=8#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Well, i did refer earlier in the post to a &lt;i&gt;&quot;music genre that could be loosely described as rock n roll&quot;&lt;/i&gt; so that applies to Wilko&#039;s music too! I dunno what it is, anyway. It&#039;s all some sort of derivative of blues, anyway, and there&#039;s not enough difference between them for me to bother about! ;-)

Anyway, he should be glad i mentioned him - even if i got the genre slightly wrong! ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, i did refer earlier in the post to a <i>&#8220;music genre that could be loosely described as rock n roll&#8221;</i> so that applies to Wilko&#8217;s music too! I dunno what it is, anyway. It&#8217;s all some sort of derivative of blues, anyway, and there&#8217;s not enough difference between them for me to bother about! <img src='http://willkemp.net.au/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Anyway, he should be glad i mentioned him &#8211; even if i got the genre slightly wrong! <img src='http://willkemp.net.au/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucy</title>
		<link>http://willkemp.net.au/blog/20080330-surf-rats/comment-page-1#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snapandscribble.com/blog/will/?p=8#comment-13</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think Wilko would thank you for describing his music as rock n roll!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think Wilko would thank you for describing his music as rock n roll!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: will</title>
		<link>http://willkemp.net.au/blog/20080330-surf-rats/comment-page-1#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 19:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snapandscribble.com/blog/will/?p=8#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Yeah, it&#039;s bad enough to have been written by McCartney! It may have sounded good in 64, but then the the people who were listening to it in 64 were probably on acid! ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, it&#8217;s bad enough to have been written by McCartney! It may have sounded good in 64, but then the the people who were listening to it in 64 were probably on acid! <img src='http://willkemp.net.au/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Kemp</title>
		<link>http://willkemp.net.au/blog/20080330-surf-rats/comment-page-1#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Kemp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 10:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snapandscribble.com/blog/will/?p=8#comment-9</guid>
		<description>&#039;Things we said today&#039; ... not one of their more memorable songs. No doubt written by Paul. It probably sounded good in 1964.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Things we said today&#8217; &#8230; not one of their more memorable songs. No doubt written by Paul. It probably sounded good in 1964.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

